Let's start with the summary. It begins with three principles:
- Social Security taxes should only be used for Social Security.
- The Social Security surplus should not be used to fund other government programs.
- The surplus should not be used to mask the true size of the national deficit.
This proposal doesn't seem to go that far. Instead, it requires that all Social Security surpluses be used to fund accounts invested in Treasuries. Here's where my confusion comes in. It cannot simultaneously be the case that:
- Actual money goes into these accounts;
- The trajectory of the Trust Fund is not lowered;
- The reported budget deficit is not increased; and
- Government expenditures are not lowered.
But I remain confused about the rollout of this plan. For example, about 15 minutes into the press conference, a reporter asks McCrery (the key question of) how he will fund the programs that are now being funded by the Social Security surplus once the SS surplus is channeled to these accounts. He gives a non-answer and then says that "there is no change in the deficit whatsoever as a result of this legislation" but that "there will be an increase in the debt." That seems like a gimmick to get around #3 above.
I see that I am not alone in my confusion--see Mark Thoma and William Polley in response to DeMint's version of this proposal.
If anyone working at the Subcommittee would like to explain what I am missing, I would be happy to post a follow-up.
Other blogs commenting on this post